Developmental & Psychological Services

A specialized practice for children, adolescents, young adults, and families.

The Savva Method: A 4-Stage Process

A formal process for mapping and building the mind.

1

Diagnosis (The Map)

A deep, multi-modal assessment (cognitive, neuropsychological, academic, emotional) to map the individual’s foundational architecture—its strengths and bottlenecks.

2

Formulation (The Blueprint)

We synthesize all diagnostic data into a single “blueprint” of your child’s mind. It explains how their patterns are a logical result of their underlying structure, answering the “why.”

3

Development (The Intervention)

Based on the formulation, we build a targeted plan. It’s a structural approach to build the specific cognitive habits, emotional skills, and environmental supports needed.

4

Autonomy

The goal is resilience. We equip the individual and family with the tools to internalize their new “operating manual” and navigate future challenges.

Case Study:

The Diagnostic Formulation

Problem: A 15-year-old “bright but unmotivated” teen, failing classes and withdrawing.

Outcome: The “motivation” problem resolves as the structural barriers are removed. The family has a clear plan, and the teen re-engages.

Measured Change:

  • Coursework completed on schedule with extended-time access and staged plans
  • Teacher ratings show improved output fluency under time pressure
  • Avoidance stance recedes; self-report shows increased task initiation and lower dread
  • Family reports fewer homework conflicts and clearer routines

1. Diagnosis — data

Cognitive (WISC-V): spiky profile. Verbal reasoning 98th percentile; processing speed 15th percentile; working memory 20th percentile.

Executive function: deficits in initiation, organization, task monitoring.

Emotional: core belief “I am a failure,” masked by an “I don’t care” stance.

2. Formulation – why

The “low motivation” is protective.

  • Core problem: processing-speed deficit plus executive dysfunction. High-level ideas outpace output capacity, especially in timed or multi-step classroom tasks.
  • Defense: to protect a smart self-image, avoidance is selected; being seen as lazy is safer than being seen as incapable.
  • Synthesis: treat the neurodevelopmental bottleneck, not “motivation.”

3. Development – plan

  1. Environment (school): extended time; reduced simultaneous demands; scaffolded task plans; keyboard access when output length matters.
  2. Skills (cognitive/executive): initiation scripts; 10-minute momentum starts; visual planning; monitoring checklists; speed-building drills 3×/week.
  3. Emotion (belief work): test and replace “failure” appraisals; track successful completions; install a competence ledger.
  4. Family: shift narrative from “lazy” to “overloaded system”; align routines and cues.

Cross-lab interfaces

  • SAL (Symbolic Analysis Lab): deconstruct the “failure” signifier and the “I don’t care” defense; rewrite the family narrative so effort is not identity-threatening.
  • GNL (Geometrical Neuroscience Lab): model the profile as a control-flow constraint: high representational capacity with a throughput bottleneck; translate to simple visuals for school.
  • ISL (Isomorphic Systems Lab): select tools—typing fluency trainer, task-sequencing app, low-friction capture; optionally a lightweight agent that prompts initiation and checks completion.
  • PSL (Pedagogical Systems Lab): redesign coursework as state-space control—fewer simultaneous constraints, staged proofs of work, credit for process.

Begin with a clear diagnosis

Change starts with an accurate, comprehensive, and compassionate map.

Contact to schedule a diagnostic consultation.

Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning.